TSS Membership Community

 View Only
  • 1.  Proper Method for Analyzing Nonmolten Particles

    Posted 07-18-2022 17:39

    Hello Everyone,

    I have two questions regarding the presence of nonmolten particles in thermal-sprayed coatings. I would be grateful if you could share with me your thoughts and experience.

    • It is well-known that non-molten particles do not receive enough energy from the energy source (i.e. flame, plasma, etc.). It is also possible that they receive sufficient energy, but they lose it prior to reaching the substrate. Is there any method that can be used to understand clearly whether the particle was not melted at all, or it was melted and then resolidified in flight?

    • One of the key reasons for the presence of non-molten particles is believed to be the fluctuation in plasma or flame during the spraying process that causes variance in the in-flight particle temperature and velocity. I am interested in knowing more about the quantitative impact of these unwelcome fluctuations. Could you please guide me about your own experience or any published research article that has explained the impact of these fluctuations from a statistical viewpoint?

    Thank you in advance for your attention.



    ------------------------------
    Milad Rad, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor
    University of Southern Indiana
    ------------------------------
    Registration for AeroMat 2025 is Now Open!


  • 2.  RE: Proper Method for Analyzing Nonmolten Particles

    Posted 07-19-2022 09:18
    Edited by Robert Miller 07-19-2022 09:27
    In principle, one could use metallography to distinguish between (A) gas-atomized, spherical, metallic feedstock particles not remelted in thermal spraying and (B) thermal sprayed particles of the same powder lot that melted and resolidified in flight.   

    The as-etched microstructure of a particle can be greatly influenced by its solidification rate.  So (A) and (B) particles of the same true size might be distinguishable if the solidification rates of (A) in manufacturing and (B) in spraying differed. 

    Note, though, that a metallographic cross-section you see may not be through the "equator" of the particle, which makes comparisons tricky---big particles can look smaller in cross-section than they really are, while solidification rates vary with true size.

    Also note that, if the thermal spray standoff distance is too low, some particles might have too little time to melt.  If the standoff is too high, some molten droplets might solidify before impact.

    About plasma fluctuations:  As you indicated, these can affect the heating rate of sprayed particles.  They're not all exposed to the same melting conditions.  Some recent equipment designs give exceptionally stable plasma jets.  Here's one new example:  https://www.arzell.com/plasma-spray-system/


    ------------------------------
    Robert Miller
    Materials Engineering Consultant
    R. A. Miller Materials Engineering
    Indianapolis IN
    (317) 698-5479
    ------------------------------

    Registration for AeroMat 2025 is Now Open!


  • 3.  RE: Proper Method for Analyzing Nonmolten Particles

    Posted 07-19-2022 10:24
    Hi Robert,

    Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge. I found the link regarding the recent equipment design and your informative explanation extremely helpful. I highly appreciate your feedback.

    ------------------------------
    Milad Rad, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor
    University of Southern Indiana
    ------------------------------

    Registration for AeroMat 2025 is Now Open!


  • 4.  RE: Proper Method for Analyzing Nonmolten Particles

    Posted 07-20-2022 03:18
    Hello Milad:

    I agree with Robert Miller that in some cases you may recognize from the particle morphology in metallographic cross-sections whether it was molten or not. However, this might not be possible for all materials. Ceramic particles, e.g., which have impacted in solid state often look smashed-like so that it is hard to decide whether they have ever been molten before. In such cases I would recommend particle in-flight diagnostics to measure particle temperatures at different spray-distances. This should enable you to find the distance with maximum temperature.

    Regarding your second question:  In [1] time resolved diagnostic measurements of the individual particle velocities and temperatures were carried out and correlated to the instantaneous voltage difference between the electrodes. The time-dependent variations in particle temperature and velocity due to the power fluctuation induced by the arc movements were found to be very large when plasma torch operates under restrike mode (Δp/p » 100%). When operating under take-over mode, those fluctuations decrease but still remain fairly large (Δp/p » 30%). Thus the arc dynamics are a prime source of broadening the distribution of particle in-flight characteristics. As a consequence the deposition rate and the microstructure of the sprayed coating are affected.

    [1] J.F. Bisson, B. Gauthier, C. Moreau, Effect of Plasma Fluctuations on In-Flight Particle Parameters, J. Thermal Spray Technol., 2003, 12(1), p 38-43

    Best regards,

    ------------------------------
    Georg Mauer
    Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH
    Jülich
    0049 2461 61 5671
    ------------------------------

    Registration for AeroMat 2025 is Now Open!


  • 5.  RE: Proper Method for Analyzing Nonmolten Particles

    Posted 07-20-2022 18:40
    Hi Georg,

    I do appreciate your feedback and guidance regarding the non-molten ceramic particles.

    Many thanks for informing me about the article. I found it very interesting and useful.

    ------------------------------
    Milad Rad, Ph.D.
    Assistant Professor
    University of Southern Indiana
    ------------------------------

    Registration for AeroMat 2025 is Now Open!