Kyle, I worked at Caterpillar from 1978 to 1982. One of my duties included the creation of the dividing factors for boron grade steels for their 1E38 specification. Got into a rather heated discussion with my boss about regression analyses. I believe Caterpillar finally codified 1E38 (now in 1E24) into the ASTM A255 standard long after I left Cat. During the late 70's there were two conference proceedings on hardenability and boron. One of the European contributions bounded the B, Al and free nitrogen to a range. I have always called it the Ugine-Aciers test. See S.K. Banerji and J.E. Morral, Boron in Steel, TMS-AIME Conference Proc. Sept. 18, 1979 p.11. My workbook attempts to incorporate that test and includes the alloy factors used by Caterpillar (1E38/ASTM A255) to reduce the boron effectiveness. There is also some interesting synergy between AlN and BN. For example, if first solution treated at 1250°C, B, N, and Al can be in solution. Upon cooling BN forms preferentially, but is eventual displaced to form AlN. See S.K. Banerji and J.E. Morral, Boron in Steel, TMS-AIME Conference Proc. Sept. 18, 1979 p.46. Now you have a kinetics mess dealing with B effectiveness. One of the pitfalls of ASTM A255 is the loss of the grain size effect on hardenability. I was able to work that back into the calculation while maintaining the Caterpillar modified carbon factors.
All that said, I'm amazed that any continuously cast B steel has a boron effectiveness.
------------------------------
David Van Aken
Missouri University of Science
Rolla MO
------------------------------