ASM Online Member Community

 View Only
  • 1.  Ingot VS Continous Cast

    Posted 5 days ago

    Good afternoon , I'm looking for any information comparing test results from ASTM E8 tensile, or E23 Charpy impact, hardness mapping, ASTM E381 macro etch, and ASTM inclusion ratings to determine if ingot cast 4140 or 4340 consistently shows better toughness, lower segregation, or more uniform properties, than continuous cast, that would indicate metallurgical superiority of the Ingot cast material.  



    ------------------------------
    Richard S
    TX
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Ingot VS Continous Cast

    Posted 4 days ago

    Reduction ratio and magnetic stirring of continuous cast strand are variables to consider.



    ------------------------------
    Craig Clauser
    President
    Craig Clauser Engineering Consulting Inc
    West Chester PA
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Ingot VS Continous Cast

    Posted 3 days ago
    Yes for sure.
    Bhaskar Yalamanchili
    409-267-1071
    bhaskaryalamanchili@gmail.com




  • 4.  RE: Ingot VS Continous Cast

    Posted 2 days ago

    Hello Richard,

    This type of data was generated back when the continuous casting process was in development. You may refer to old literature to obtain specific data. In general, the mechanical properties would depend on section thickness of the final product, heat treatment and the end application. 

    The ingot derived products, in most cases, yield superior properties. This is due processing of the ingot. Ingots are cast vertically in large sections, with heat being extracted from the  bottom while maintaining hot top. This results in shrinkage porosity and impurity segregation at the top of the ingot. The solidification takes place directionally in the long direction. The ingot is then trimmed to remove surface skin and top region before hot rolling commences. Since the reduction in area during hot rolling is large in the ingot derived products, a finer and more uniform microstructure is obtained. In general, an ingot derived product will have the following advantages over the continuous cast products:

    • Higher transverse strength
    • Lower inclusion concentration
    • Finer inclusion size
    • Finer carbides
    • Higher toughness, particularly in the transverse direction
    • Higher fatigue strength
    • Higher uniformity across thickness

    The continuous cast products are produced in smaller cross section size and, therefore, do not undergo high reduction in area during hot rolling like the ingot derived products. As a result, the microstructure is not subjected to extensive breakdown typically seen with the ingot derived products. Also, due to the nature of the process, the segregations and inclusions are trapped in the center of the continuous cast billet. 

    You may see comparable properties from the two processes when the reduction in area during hot rolling is comparable and critical properties for service use are longitudinal.

    Please refer to old journals for more information. The steel suppliers will also have this information in their product portfolio.

    Good Luck!

    Ratnesh Dwivedi, Ph.D.

    RKD ENGG, LLC

    www.rkdengg.com



    ------------------------------
    [Ratnesh] [Dwivedi]
    [President]
    [RKD ENGG, LLC]

    www.rkdengg.com
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Ingot VS Continous Cast

    Posted yesterday

    Some of the information that you seek is available in Vol. 15 "Castings" of the ASM Metals Handbook.  Chapter headings such as "Steel Castings", and its subheadings "Steel Ingot Casting" versus "Steel Continuous Castings", as well as "Steel Castings Properties" and "Selection and Evaluation of Steel Castings" might prove helpful.

     

    Sincerely,

    John Tartaglia

     

    John M. Tartaglia, Ph.D. & FASM
    Senior Metallurgical Engineer
    Element Materials Technology
    51229 Century Court
    Wixom
    MI
    48393
    United States
    +1 248 960 4900
    +1 248 960 4970
    john.tartaglia@element.com
    www.element.com
    Automotive Buzz, Squeak, and Rattle (BSR) Testing

    Disclaimer

    This email is sent on behalf of Element Materials Technology Group Limited or the relevant group company with which you are dealing (together, Element). Element Materials Technology Group Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales with registered number 09915743. Its registered office and its principal place of business is at 3rd Floor, Davidson Building, 5 Southampton Street, London, United Kingdom, WC2E 7HA.

    Element cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage sustained as a result of viruses or malware and the recipient must ensure that the email and attachments are virus and malware free. Emails and attachments are opened at your own risk.

    The information transferred is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Transmission of this email is not intended to waive confidentiality and/or privilege.

    The contents of this email are subject to contract and do not contain an offer that is capable of acceptance. Unless otherwise agreed in writing with you, the Element Standard Terms of Business for the relevant group company apply in respect of any services provided to you, including advice given to you by email. The Standard Terms of Business are available on request and can be found at https://www.element.com/terms/terms-and-conditions

    For information about how we process data and monitor communications please see our Privacy statement at https://www.element.com/terms/privacy-statement